- 1、本文档共2页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Developing an HIV Vaccine The Role of Efficacy Studies in Nonhuman Primates 英文参考文献
Open access, freely available online
Correspondence
Enophthalmos Is Not Present
in Horner Syndrome
foundation for bioethics. But without human nature, on what
grounds can advances in biomedical knowledge be called
good or bad, right or wrong, or even harmful or bene?cial?
Clearly Caplan and Elliott have to accept something as a
touchstone of their bioethical discourse, or it will lapse into
windy incoherence. Although they approach it from different
angles, this benchmark is informed consent, with Elliott
placing the stress on “informed” and Caplan on “consent”.
As a result, their lively disagreement over enhancement
technology is just verbal sparring and not a battle of ideas.
Caplan believes that the consumer-patient is suf?ciently
mature to weigh up the dangers; Elliott is more sceptical.
Neither appears to think that it makes any sense to argue that
technology should be suited to human nature. This belief
seems to be widespread in the bioethics community. Ruth
Macklin, a bioethicist at Albert Einstein College of Medicine,
argued recently, for instance, that “human dignity” is an
empty and meaningless concept [2].
However, academic discourse has failed to dislodge from
the heads of the hoi polloi the conviction that the starting
point of ethics is not consent but happiness. The man in the
street, the ultimate consumer of bioethics, still believes in
human nature. The notion that human dignity is meaningless
would be regarded by nearly all Americans as not merely
absurd but reprehensible.
What I ?nd odd in the writings of many bioethicists is that
they skirt around the question that the average person wants
to ask: will this enhancement make me happy in a deeply
satisfying and ful?lling way? He or she is much less interested
in whether all the boxes on the informed consent form have
been ticked properly.
Robert Daroff
The case report by Nautiyal et al. [1] is an instructive
reminder that the ?rst episode of an acute painful Horner
Syndrome should prompt imag
您可能关注的文档
- Determinants of the Cost-Effectiveness of Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Infants and Children 英文参考文献.doc
- Determination of Baroreflex Sensitivity during the Modified Oxford Maneuver by Trigonometric Regressive Spectral Analysis 英文参考文献.doc
- Determination of Diniconazole in Agricultural Samples by Sol-Gel Immunoaffinity Extraction Procedure Coupled with HPLC and ELISA 英文参考文献.doc
- Determinants of the Incidence of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease in China Using Geographically Weighted Regression Models 英文参考文献.doc
- Determinants of the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic in Europe Implications for Real-Time Modelling 英文参考文献.doc
- Determinants, Discriminants, Conserved Residues - A Heuristic Approach to Detection of Functional Divergence in Protein Families 英文参考文献.doc
- Determination of Baylisascaris schroederi Infection in Wild Giant Pandas by an Accurate and Sensitive PCRCE-SSCP Method 英文参考文献.doc
- Determination of EGFR Endocytosis Kinetic by Auto-Regulatory Association of PLD1 with μ2 英文参考文献.doc
- Determination of the Loss of Function Complement C4 Exon 29 CT Insertion Using a Novel Paralog-Specific Assay in Healthy UK and Spanish Populations 英文参考文献.doc
- Determining Biophysical Protein Stability in Lysates by a Fast Proteolysis Assay, FASTpp 英文参考文献.doc
文档评论(0)