公司股东权的司法保中护若干问题探讨.docVIP

公司股东权的司法保护若干问题探讨 目 录 论文摘要1 一、股东提起的直接诉讼3-5 二、股东提起自身派生诉讼6-9 三、 参考 文献 10 论 文 摘 要 随着我国市场 经济 体制的确立与不断完善，公司作为市场主体形式之一，在市场经济中拌演着越来越重要的角色，而相应的权利的义务规定的较为笼统特别是行使诉权的方式、途径规定的不是那么详尽。笔者即是围绕股东权的司法保护 问题 ，即股东的诉讼提起权进行了论述。笔者就股东诉讼的形式以及直接诉讼和派生诉讼，两种形式所应具备的条件以及行使诉权的途径和方式进行分类论述。对股东提起的直接诉讼，主要围绕（一）停止侵害或不法行为之诉；（二）确认无效之诉和撤诉之诉；（三）赔偿之诉；（四）返还之诉；（五）诉请解散公司之诉等五个方面进行论述。而对股东提起的派生诉讼，因 目前 我国股东仅具有形式上的诉权，而实质上的诉权则归于公司。所以这种实体的权利的实现，目前从程序法上较难实现的，笔者主要从国外的现行规定以及国内 法律 理念进行论述，这种权利实现的必要性与可操作性，并对股东工作为原告提起诉讼时，应从（1）主体资格；（2）起诉事实与理由；（3）是否是被侵害之共同权利无法通过其它途径正常合理的解决等三个方面应注意事项进行了阐述。 关键词：1、股东权 2、股东的直接诉讼 3、股东的派生诉讼 Talking about the text takes off to want Along with the establishment of the our country market economy system with continuously perfect, company conduct and actions market corpus form of a, mix to play the more and more important role in market economy, but the duty of the homologous right rules more general to exercise the way, Path provision of is not so detailed? that tell the power especially The writer is around the judicial protection problem of the shareholder power, namely the litigation of the shareholder brings up the power proceeded the treatise.Writer litigant form in shareholder and direct litigation with send to living the litigation, two kinds of forms a term for should having and exercise the path that tell the power to proceed the classification treatise with the way.To direct litigation that shareholder bring up, main stop violating around( a) or illegal act it tell;( two) confirm the invalid telling with withdraw to tell it tell;( three) indemnification it tell;( four) return to return it tell;( five) appeal to dismiss the company it telling and waiting five aspects proceeds the treatise.But the parties that bring up livings the litigation to the shareholder, tell the power to then return substantially in the company because of the current our country shareholder has only the telling the power of formality,.So the right of this kind of entity realizes, current from the procedure method more