论“买功”行为的性质.pdfVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
论“买功”行为的性质

Abstract “Buying meritorious service” is a new phenomenon appeared in judicial practice in recent years. Since the “rendering meritorious Service ’system is not perfect, there is a disorder in judicial practice, such as, no standard for cognizance, and investigation procedure. Some people even take it improperly as the basis to reduce the criminal sanction for the defendant. In current academic field, there is no uniform opinion on the issue that whether the “buying meritorious service” can be cognized as “rendering meritorious Service ’. There are different opinions, like, positive theory, negative theory, or distinguishing theory. They all discuss the nature of the “buying meritorious service” from different perspectives. But there are different degrees of defects for each theory. They have not grasped the nature and legislative principle for “rendering meritorious Service”. The author proposes the action of ‘buying meritorious service ’ should be cognized as ‘rendering meritorious Service”. It is not only based on the requirement from the principle of conviction and penalty according to the law, but also based on the value pursuit for the “rendering meritorious Service ’system. And meanwhile it is based on the requirement of the natural characteristics of the ‘rendering meritorious Service’system. But because of the basic legal principal that criminals can not benefit from their own illegal activities, to ‘buying meritorious service” through illegal activities should be excluded from the scope of “rendering meritorious Service ’ However, the judicature ’s choice is extremely utilitarian. The litigation from the victims has been ignored to some extent. In order to adjust it, we should build a national system to compensate the victims. Key words: Buying meritorious servi

文档评论(0)

sheppha + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5134022301000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档