- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同攻击性水平大学生面孔–物体识别的差异研究.pdf
Advances in Psychology 心理学进展, 2017, 7(2), 216-224
Published Online February 2017 in Hans. /journal/ap
/10.12677/ap.2017.72028
Research on the Difference of Face-Object
Recognition among College Students
of Different Aggression Levels
1 2
Chun Yang , Lijun Sun
1
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing
2
Department of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang Henan
th th th
Received: Feb. 7 , 2017; accepted: Feb. 20 , 2017; published: Feb. 24 , 2017
Abstract
Objective: Study the characteristics of face recognition among college students of different aggres-
sion levels, and have a deep insight into the internal mechanism of individual attack behavior.
Methods: Using stratified cluster sampling, we obtained 128 college students from Southwest uni-
versity including freshmen and senior students. With BPAQ aggression questionnaire and implicit
association test (IAT), we sorted out four kinds of subjects, high and low explicit aggression, high
and low implicit aggression, according to the principle of 27%, each of 30 people. Next, subjects of
different aggression levels performed face-object recognition experiments. The dependent varia-
ble was the reaction time and accuracy of subjects. Results: 1) There was a significant difference
(P 0.001) in response time between faces and objects. The response time of the individual rec-
ognition object was significantly greater than that of the recognition face. 2) Groups of different
aggression levels had no difference in face-object recognition tasks. Conclusions: 1) The response
speed of recognition faces is faster than that of the object. 2) The levels of aggression do not affect
您可能关注的文档
- 一年级(下)音乐教案花城版.doc
- 一张公民证见证一段抗战岁月.PDF
- 一步一个脚印走向梦想.PDF
- 一年级话说温州-温州博物馆.ppt
- 一般公共预算项目支出预算表.PDF
- 丁晓明_核电工程经济数据库.pdf
- 七下作业本答案.pdf
- 七年级上美术课课件.ppt
- 万华化学集团股份有限公司2016年度股东大会现场主要交流.PDF
- 三、金融消费者保护的分类.PDF
- 2022年11月连江县直机关遴选公务员面试真题带答案详解.docx
- 2022年11月遵义市直遴选面试真题回忆版.docx
- 2022年2月伊春市税务系统遴选面试真题回忆版.docx
- 2022年11月朔州市税务系统遴选面试真题回忆版汇总.docx
- 2022年2月秦皇岛市税务系统遴选面试真题回忆版汇总.docx
- 2022年2月焦作市直机关遴选公务员面试真题附详解.docx
- 2022年11月黑龙江省直机关遴选公务员面试真题附详细解析.docx
- 2022年2月潍坊市直机关遴选公务员面试真题附解析.docx
- 2022年2月大同市直遴选面试真题附详解.docx
- 2022年2月巴音郭楞蒙古自治州直机关遴选公务员面试真题带题目详解.docx
文档评论(0)