3m场地与10m场地的数据(国外英文资料).docVIP

3m场地与10m场地的数据(国外英文资料) Can the radiation data from the 3m site directly replace the 10m site data? (2010-08-31 13:53:31) One problem with 3 m testing is that there is a fall - off the projection problem that is usually seen below 200 MHz in vertical polarization. If * at 3 m, the maximum vertical field propagates along the ground plane (normal to the ground plane) due to the reflection. Since the can antenna is scanned be used between 1 and 4 m, some of the energy goes under the can antenna. Be used ? One of the problems with the three-meter field test is the attenuation emission, which usually occurs in the vertical direction of 200MHz. If you have a 3-meter field test, because of the presence of the launch phenomenon, the maximum value of the vertical area propagation is along the horizontal plane, which is normally on the ground plane. Because the antenna is scanned between one and four meters, the antenna cannot capture the energy that is transmitted under the antenna. At 10 m the wavefront is more developed and with the same scan window, 1 to 4 m more of the main lobe of the total field propagating on the ground plane is measured. The data from the 3 m to subtract 10 dB from the measured data to account for 3 to 10 m fall - off. But that is free - space assumption without the ground plane effect. ? In the 10-meter field, the wavefront is more extended and has the same scanning window, where a meter to four meters and more of the area propagated in the ground will be measured. If the test lab as there is no ground plane effect of free space, due to the attenuation of the length of the 3 m to 10 m, then 3 m field test data can be roughly equivalent to 10 meters by 10 db field test data. At 10 m, more of the energy is measured and the when compared to the projected fields done At 3 m, up to 7 dB errors have had been reported. The 3 m data later underpredicts the field At 10 m. This has under caused products that were thought to pass the when * At 3 m to then fail