阅读理解之推理判断类课案.docx

阅读理解之推理判断类题型特点推理判断题，是一种主观题，是层次较高的设题。包括两方面：判断和推理。这两方面相互依存，推理是为了做出正确的判断，而判断又依赖于合情合理的判断。从题干看常含infer，suggest,imply,indicate，conclude等词语。设问方式From the letters weve learned that /What canwe learn about …This passage/text would most likely be found in/taken from...Where does this text probably come from?What can be inferred from the passage?/We can infer from the text that..According to the passage/text/author,we can...Why did the author mention...?The author implies that...The passage is probably written/intended for...What’s the author’s attitude towards/opinion on...The author develops the text by ...Which of the following shows the structure of the whole text?考点一 推理判断类推理判断题，是指根据原文已知事实进行逻辑推理，推断出作者①没有提到的的事实，②或者作者没有说明的事实，③或者可能发生的事实。旨在考查考生透过词语的字面意义去理解作者的言外之意和玄外之音。解题技巧：技巧一 寻读相关信息点—研读—理解相关信息点的字面意思—逻辑推理—找出弦外之音技巧二 识别干扰项，找出正确项干扰项一般都有这样的特点：◆似是而非：即对原文信息的简单重复◆夸大事实：即夸大文章的事实和证据◆推理过度：即选项过于绝对化和片面化，如only和all的表述◆掺入常识: 常识是正确的，但不是根据文章而推断出来的，采用的手法是偷梁换柱Sample 1 Pedestrian deaths went down by 12% from 5,449 in 1996 to 4,784 in 2006, But among those in 2006, 471 were killed in crosswalks, down slightly from 488 ten years earlier, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) says.◆The report from NHTSA suggests that _____.fewer people were injured in crosswalks B. crosswalk safety has been greatly improvedC. much has been done to reduce traffic accidents D. pedestrian deaths in crosswalks remain a serious problemSample 2Humans have a very varied diet. We often eat food because we like it and not because it is good for us. In countries such as France and Britain, people eat foods with too much sugar. This makes them overweight, which is bad for their health. Eating too much red meat and animal products, such as butter, can also be bad for the health. Choosing the right food, therefore, has become an area of study in modern life.◆ We can infer from the last paragraph that ______.A. food is chosen for a good reasonB. French and British food are to blame for healthy problemC. people