- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
基干模糊数学法评价甲基溴与其替代技术
基于模糊数学法评价甲基溴及其替代技术 摘要:为履行《关于消耗臭氧层物质的蒙特利尔议定书》规定,运用模糊数学综合评判法,探讨了甲基溴及其替代技术在土壤熏蒸过程中的各项因素,构建了作物产量、作物品质、病虫害防治效果、技术安全、操作过程、环境影响、应用时长和投入成本8个指标集,并划分了模糊评判集,综合评估了生姜、草莓作物甲基溴及其替代技术。生姜作物综合评估结果为甲基溴(83.61)氯化苦(79.06)棉隆(78.03)威百亩(69.07),草莓作物综合评估结果为甲基溴(69.13)氯化苦(64.60)棉隆(56.80)。各单项指标评价结果表明,甲基溴在作物产量、作物品质、防治效果以及应用时长等4个指标上均高于各项替代技术,但由于自身毒性、对臭氧层物质消耗以及受生产管控等因素的影响,在其余指标上低于替代技术;氯化苦在作物产量、作物品质和病虫害防治效果等6项指标上均高于其他替代技术,但由于为剧毒农药,而在技术安全和操作过程2项指标上低于其余替代技术。以上结果表明,生姜作物和草莓作物主流替代技术的消毒效果并不具备甲基溴的广谱性,当前最佳替代技术为氯化苦
关键词:甲基溴;替代技术;模糊数学综合评判法;技术评估
中图分类号:S472 文献标识码:A 文章编号:0439-8114(2016)14-3626-05
DOI:10.14088/ki.issn0439-8114.2016.14.021
Abstract: To fulfill The Montreal Protocol on Ozone Depleting Substances, fuzzy mathematics comprehensive evaluation method was used to discuss the effect of methyl bromide and its alternatives on the process of soil fumigation. The factors included crop yields, crop quality, pest control, technical safety, technical operation, environmental impact and costs, which were divided into fuzzy evaluation set to assess effect of methyl bromide and its alternatives on the ginger and strawberry comprehensively. The results showed that the order of effect on ginger was bromide(83.61)chloropicrin(79.06)dazomet(78.03)metam sodium(69.07), the order of effect on strawberry was bromide(69.13)chloropicrin(64.60)dazomet(56.80). The comprehensive results showed that methyl bromide was higher than the alternatives in four factors such as crop yields, crop quality, control effect and time of technical operations, but it was worse than the alternatives because of the toxicity of methyl bromide and its consumption of O3 as well as production controlling. Chloropicrin was better than other alternatives in six indicators including crop yields, crop quality and pest control, but it was a highly toxic pesticide so that it was worse than other alternatives in the process of technical and operational safety. These results suggested that the effect of mainstream alternatives on the ginger and s
原创力文档


文档评论(0)