体教专业普修课教学中不同考试标准的对比研究——以韶关学院短跑、背越式跳高为例.pdfVIP

运动精品 Physical Education Review 却15 年(第34卷)第 12 期 Vol. 34 ,NO.12 ,2015 体教专业普修课教学中不同考试标准的对比研究 一一以韶关学院短跑、背越式跳高为例 汪广茂1 历祥英2 (1.韶关大学体育学院，广东韶关 512∞5;2. 哈尔滨工业大学体育部，黑龙江哈尔滨 15∞01) 摘 要:通过对韶关大学体育学院2012级和2013 级体教专业男生田径短跑、背越式跳高普修课教学中采用不同考试 标准的对比研究发现:采用不同的达标标准教学，其效果是不同的，所培养的学生的水平和能力也是不同的，达标考 试标准高、要求高，学生的成绩和技术相对好，学生的水平和能力相对高;反之亦然。采用不同的达标考试标准教学， 对教师和学生的促进作用是不同的，达标考试标准高、要求高，能促进学生积极、主动地学习，能促进教师教学水平的 提高。 关键词:短跑;背越式疏离;普修课教学;考试标准;这标与扶许 A Contrastive Study of DifTerent Examination Standard in the General Optional Course Teaching of PE SpeciaIty 一-taking sprint and back style high jump for examples WANG Guang-mao , etal. (pE college ofShaoguan University , Shaoguan 512005 ,Guangdong , China) Abs衍ac旬Though the comparative study of using different examination standards in the general optional course of sprint and back style hi阱jump for the Grade 2012 and 2013 PE specialty boys in PE college of Shaoguan University , it is found 也at different examination standards in teaching lead to different result , the level and ability 缸e different. High test standard and high demand in teaching , the student白， academic achievement and technology is relatively better; on 由e contrary, low test standard low demand in teaching, the resu1t is relatively worse. It can be concluded 也at using different examination standard in teaching will bring different bilateral promotion both to teachers and students, high test standard high demand will sp田 students to study positively and actively, as well 嗣 promote 出e teachers teaching ab出ty. Keywords: sprint; back style high jump; general optional course; examination st