- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Look from the Anglo―American jury system of jury system in our country
Look from the Anglo―American jury system of jury system in our country
Abstract:Jury system as the embodiment of democracy in the modern history of social value has significant meaning.This article from the perspective of comparative law,by comparing the two countries jury system,found the characteristics and differences between the two,According to our country’s relevant legal system and legal theory at the same time,for the perfection of jury system in China is very line of inquiry.
Keywords:Jury system;Jury;Juror
一、The jury system
(一)An overview of jury system
Jury system refers to the non-professional judges and ordinary citizens to participate in the trial of the lawsuit system,for non-professional judges and ordinary citizens to participate in the trial judge of the specially designed and as a special judicial organization structure.Jury system generally believe that originated in the United Kingdom,Mainly has the jury system of Anglo-American law system and continental law system and judge system of two forms.Form of the people’s jury system in China is similar to the umpire system,but is out of specification operation,There exist defects,It is necessary to draw lessons from foreign advanced experience.
Jury system is conducive to judicial democracy,Judicial democracy requires social members participate in judicial and reach the purpose of restriction and supervision of judicial through participation.This is the important embodiment of people’s sovereignty thought.On the one hand, can make people have involved the ownership feeling of justice;?on the other hand, due to the jurors from all walks of life, can make the process of brainstorming, wider on behalf of the people’s point of view, to prevent the judicial decision subjective arbitrary of one-sided and judges.
In trial activities, people’s assessors and judges are mutually cooperation relationship. But should respect each other independence, it is relative to limit the powers of a
您可能关注的文档
- .NET内存分配及释放解析.doc
- A Case Study of Computer―based Teacher―Student Interaction outside Class.doc
- A Tribute to Beijing’s Tap Water.doc
- ABA训练法提升自闭症儿童情绪识别能力个案探究.doc
- ABC分类法在库存管理中应用.doc
- ABC理论在高校德育管理工作中演变及应用探究.doc
- ACCELINK.WTD竞争战略探析.doc
- Acura品牌再度升华 全新一代NSX巅峰上市.doc
- ADA及ALT、AST、GGT联合检测在肝脏疾病诊断价值探究.doc
- ADAMS在机械专业学生实践教学改革中应用.doc
最近下载
- 孟子三章课件.ppt VIP
- 《德尔菲法案例》课件.ppt VIP
- 2024-2025学年七年级生物上册 第一单元 单元测试卷(冀少版).pdf VIP
- 人工智能实训室建设方案.pdf VIP
- 人教版初中必背古诗词、文言文.pdf VIP
- 广西和塑建材有限公司年产4000吨ASA合成树脂瓦项目环境影响报告.docx VIP
- 2025至2030国内药用塑料瓶行业市场发展分析及竞争格局与投资机会报告.docx
- 第2课 我向国旗敬个礼( 课件)统编版《道德与法治》一年级上册.pptx
- 2025至2030中国OLED载板玻璃行业发展趋势预判及市场前景研究报告.docx VIP
- 智能矿山暨无人驾驶行业蓝皮书.pdf VIP
文档评论(0)