- 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
智 课 网 托 福 备 考 资 料
托福阅读――心理类(三)
Teachers, it is thought, benefit from the practice of reflection,
the conscious act of thinking deeply about and carefully
examining the interactions and events within their own
classrooms. Educators T. Wildman and J. Niles (1987) describe a
scheme for developing reflective practice in experienced
teachers. This was justified by the view that reflective practice
could help teachers to feel more intellectually involved in their
role and work in teaching and enable them to cope with the
paucity of scientific fact and the uncertainty of knowledge in the
discipline of teaching.
Wildman and Niles were particularly interested in
investigating the conditions under which reflection might
flourish–a subject on which there is little guidance in the
literature. They designed an experimental strategy for a group of
teachers in Virginia and worked with 40 practicing teachers over
several years. They were concerned that many would be “drawn
to these new, refreshing” conceptions of teaching only to find
that the void between the abstractions and the realities of
teacher reflection is too great to bridge. Reflection on a complex
task such as teaching is not easy.” The teachers were taken
through a program of talking about teaching events, moving on
to reflecting about specific issues in a supported, and later an
independent, manner.
Wildman and Niles observed that systematic reflection on
teaching required a sound ability to understand classroom
events in an objective manner. They describe the initial
understanding in the teachers with whom they were working as
being “utilitarian … and not rich or detailed enough to drive
systematic reflection.” Teachers rarely have the time or
opportunities to view their own or the teaching of others in an
objective manner. Further observation revealed the tendency of
teachers to evaluate events rather than review the contributory
factors in a co
文档评论(0)