网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

市场调查5+Non-comparative+Scales.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共21页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
市场调查5Non-comparativeScales

Marketing Research Session 5: Non-Comparative Scales Continuous rating scales Itemized rating scales (Likert, Semantic differential, and Stapel scales) Non-Comparative Scales Each object (e.g., brand, product attributes, product categories, firms, political candidates, etc.) is scaled independently of the others in the stimulus set (no comparison between more than one objects and between an object and some specific standard, such as ideal brand). The respondents employ whatever rating standard seems appropriate to them. In general, the resulting data are assumed to be interval or ratio scaled. This type of scaling is most widely used in marketing research. Example Measure the satisfaction with the recent purchase of a Dell computer. Experience with e-Bay Absolute importance of free checking Continuous rating scale (graphic rating scale): this measurement scale has the respondents rate the objects by placing a mark at the appropriate position on a line that runs from one extreme of the criterion variable to the other. The form may vary considerably, such as vertical or horizontal line, scale points in the form of numbers or brief descriptions, etc. e.g., the worst service the best service Once the respondent has provided the ratings, the researcher divides the line into as many categories as desired and assigned scores based on the categories into which the ratings fall. These scores are treated as interval data. Examples How would you rate Sears as a department store? Probably the worst Probably the best Probably the worst Probably the best 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Probably the worst Probably the best 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Very bad Neither good nor bad Very good Pros: easy and simple to construct; Cons: cumbersome and unreliable scoring. Overly extreme anchors tend to force respondents toward the middle of the scale Itemized rating scale a measurement scale having numbers and/or brief des

文档评论(0)

xcs88858 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8130065136000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档