东海大陆架划界问题探析.pdfVIP

摘要 摘 要 中日两国在东海上一直争议不断，2004 年春晓油田事件虽然历经数年，经 过中日的谈判达成所谓“6.18 共识”，但日方的飞机、舰船一直骚扰中方正常开 采活动。2012 年日本政府无视中国坚决反对，公开将钓鱼岛进行所谓的国有化， 中日东海大陆架划界问题再次被推上风口浪尖。随后，中国政府向大陆架界限 委员会提交东海部分海域 200 海里以外大陆架划界案。中日两国在大陆架划界 原则、冲绳海槽和钓鱼岛在大陆架划界中的作用等方面存在很大的分歧。本文 将围绕这三个方面以及国际法和国际司法实践，论证中国对于东海大陆架划界 主张是合理合法的。 本文主要内容分为四个部分。第一部分，介绍中日东海大陆架划界争端概 况。第二部分，中日东海大陆架划界原则及国际司法实践。第三部分，钓鱼岛 以及冲绳海槽在东海大陆架划界争端中的法律地位。第四部分，解决中日大陆 架划界纷争的不足与建议。 关键词：大陆架；东海；划界原则；国际实践 II 万方数据 Abstract ABSTRACT The confrontation between Japan and China over the sovereign rights of the East China Sea seems to be a never-ending story. Although the incident of the Chunxiao Oil Field in 2005 have achieved the 6 ••18 Consensus，the Chinese normal mining activities still being harassed by Japanese aircrafts and ships. In 2012 ， ignoring Chinas resolute opposition，Japanese government openly implemented the so-called “nationalization” of the Diaoyu Islands, which pushed the East China Sea continental shelf delimitation issue to the cusp again. Meanwhile ，Chinese Foreign Ministry immediately announced that the Chinese government decided to submit the case of the delimitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles of the East China Sea, parts of the ocean . There is a huge difference in the principles of delimitation of the continental shelf, the Okinawa Trough and the Diaoyu between China and Japan regarding their roles in the case. This essay focus