合同终止2概要1.pptx

  1. 1、本文档共55页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
合同终止2概要1

Termination of contract;A breach of contract is committed when a party without lawful excuse fails or refuses to perform what is due from him under the contract, or performs defectively or incapacitates himself from performing.;The doctrine of compensation The doctrine of limitations on damages ;The doctrine of expectation interest 期待利益 The doctrine of reliance interest信赖利益 The doctrine of restitution interest 无偿得利;Both parties at the time of the conclusion of a contract have expectation interest over the contract, and the injured party is entitled to his expectation interest lost by the party in breach. Courts ordinarily protect the expectation that the injured party had when making the contract by attempting to put the injured party in as good a position as that party would have been in had the contract been performed, that is, had there been no breach.;When the defendant’s promise to perform his contractual obligations, the claimant has acted to his detriment in entering into the contract and the award of damages should compensate the defendant. To put the claimant in as good a position as he was in before the defendant’s promise was made.;A claimant who claims the protection of his restitution interest does not wish to be compensated for the loss which he has suffered; rather, he wishes to deprive the defendant of a gain which he has made at the claimant’s expense. See example on p. 116;Non-breaching party has the duty to mitigate damage. Damages must be established with a reasonable degree of certainty. 1 Damages must be either foreseeable to the breaching party or would naturally flow from the breach. Hadley v. Baxendale. Prutch v. Ford Motor Company. p117;Specific performance Avoidance Price reduction Refusing early delivery and excess quantity ;Failing to make an agreed delivery Delivering goods that do not conform to the contract Indicating an intention not to fulfill the obligations under the contract.;A court requires a party to the contract to perform,

文档评论(0)

yaocen + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档