90-比较优势理论为什么可能错（Why is the theory of comparative advantage wrong）.docVIP

下载本文档

9
0
约9.52千字
约 6页
2017-07-20 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

90-比较优势理论为什么可能错（Why is the theory of comparative advantage wrong）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

90-比较优势理论为什么可能错（Why is the theory of comparative advantage wrong）

90-比较优势理论为什么可能错（Why is the theory of comparative advantage wrong） The trade between developed and backward countries will reduce the relative prices of labor-intensive products in developed countries markets, thus lowering the wages of developed countries relative to interest rates and combating the interests of workers, while the protection of tariff policies can protect the interests of developed countries. However, many people with practical experience criticize the SS theorem. They pointed out that although the protection of tariffs may be marginalized to improve the labor status of developed countries, but it is possible to reduce the level of international division of labor, so that these workers eventually damaged. The model of Cheng Wenli, Saxophone and Yang Xiaokai (Cheng, Sachs and Yang, 1999) proved this by super-marginal analysis. It does not mean that when a country chooses a corner solution (fully specialized), the SS theorem does not hold, even if all countries are not specialized (the equilibrium occurs in the so-called diversity cone) and the factor intensity reversal does not occur, They also find a counterexample, that is, if the production function parameters caused by changes in the relative price of the product and the product relative price changes, if people of the two products hobby difference is great, the labor-intensive product prices may be lower with the wage relative interest rate occur. Dixit and Norman (1980) also found a counter-example of the SS Theorem. They also find out the example of the Rushs Theorem which does not exist under all his assumptions. If you do not add to the assumptions about the outcome of the decision, but from the set model to solve the optimal decision-making and general equilibrium, only in the production of alternative elements of elasticity is not much difference, people are not different differences in different goods, and factor endowments When the difference is not large, the factor density reversal wil