- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
宣肺涤尘汤治疗尘肺病的临床探究
摘 要
目的:观察宣肺涤尘汤对尘肺患者临床症状、体征、6 分钟步行试验及肺功能的
影响。方法:将 60 例尘肺病患者随机分为两组,对照组30例予以常规对症治疗,观
察组 30 例在常规治疗的基础上服用宣肺涤尘汤以宣肺祛邪、化痰祛瘀,疗程为 3 个
月。观察两组治疗前后的临床症状、体征、6 分钟步行试验及肺功能检查结果。结果:
临床数据统计分析表明,观察组显效率为 70%、总有效率为 96.7%,差异显著有统计
学意义(P0.05 )。治疗前后及两组比较,观察组胸闷、憋气、咳嗽、咳痰、胸痛等
临床症状均有所减轻,差异显著,有统计学意义(P0.05 );观察组 6 分钟步行距离、
呼吸困难指数、血氧饱和度均有所改善,差异显著,有统计学意义 (P0.05 );FEV1% 、
FEV1/FVC 较治疗前及对照组治疗后有改善,差异显著,有统计学意义(P0.05 )。
结论:以中药宣肺祛邪、化痰祛瘀方法组方宣肺涤尘汤加减,可以减轻患者的临床症
状,改善肺通气功能,提高患者的运动耐量,改善患者生活质量。
关键词 尘肺病;宣肺涤尘汤;6 分钟步行试验;肺功能
Clinical Study on Treatment of Pneumoconiosis
with Xuanfei Dichen Tang
Speciality: Combine traditional Chinese and western medicine
Author: Wang Xing
Tutor: Gao Jian-dong
Abstract
Object: To observe the effect of Xuanfei Dichen Tang on clinical symptoms and signs,
six-minute walking test and pulmonary function for the patients with pneumoconiosis.
Methods: Sixty patients with pneumoconiosis were randomly divided into two
groups. Thirty patients in the test group were treated with Xuanfei Dichen Tang with
principle of ventilating lung and eliminating pathogens, resolving phlegm and activating
blood in addition to conventional therapy, while other thirty patients in the control group
were treated with conventional therapy. The treatment course for two groups was three
months. The changes of clinical symptoms and signs, six-minute walking test and
pulmonary function of the patients before and after treatment in the two groups were under
close observation.
Result: The clinical data analysis show that there was significant statistical difference
between the two groups(P0.05), the obvious effective rate of the test group was 70% and
the total effective rate was 96.7%.The results befor
文档评论(0)