滋阴清热法治疗慢性肾小球肾炎的临床探究.pdfVIP

滋阴清热法治疗慢性肾小球肾炎的临床探究.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
滋阴清热法治疗慢性肾小球肾炎的临床探究

提 要 目的:观察滋阴清热法(竹叶石膏汤合二至地黄汤加减)为主,治疗慢性肾小 球肾炎的临床疗效,并从现代医学角度深入探讨其作用机理。方法:将符合入选标 准的 72 例慢性肾小球肾炎患者随机分为两组,治疗组与对照组均给予血管紧张素 Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARB )控制血压,其中治疗组 36 例予以竹叶石膏汤合二至地黄汤 加减治疗;对照组 36 例,予以肾炎康复片治疗,用药 2 个月为一个疗程,两组均 服用 1 个疗程。结果:治疗组患者的临床证候总积分明显降低,疗效明显优于对照 组(P<0.01);治疗组患者的 24h 尿蛋白定量水平明显降低,疗效明显优于对照组 (P<0.05);治疗组患者的超敏 C 反应蛋白、尿蛋白、尿潜血、尿素氮、血肌酐水 平明显降低,疗效优于对照组(P<0.05);血脂、血压、补体C3两组相比无明显 差异,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:以竹叶石膏汤合二至地黄汤加减为代表 的滋阴清热法治疗慢性肾小球肾炎疗效明显优于肾炎康复片。 关键词 慢性肾小球肾炎;中医药疗法;滋阴清热法;竹叶石膏汤合二至地黄汤; 临床研究 Clinical Research on Treatment of Chronic Glomerulonephritis with Nourishing Yin and Clearing Heat Speciality:Internal medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine Author:Qu Zongxu Tutor:Prof.Yu Junsheng Abstract Objective:In order to observe the clinical effect of the treatment with nourishing Yin and clearing heat for chronic glomerulonephritis,and the treatment is implemented mainly through Modified Zhuyeshigao and Erzhidihuang soup, explore its mechanism according to the perspective of modern medicine. Methods:72 patients diagnosed the chronic glomerulonephritis were randomly classified into two groups.Both the two groups were treated with Angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blockers to control the blood pressure. 36 patients were treated with Modified Zhuyeshigao and Erzhidihuang soup in treated group; others were treated with Shenyankangfu tablet in control group. Two months were a course of treatment. Both groups were taking a course of treatment. Result:The patients’ clinical symptoms total score of treatment group was significantly reduced, significantly better than the control group (P0.01). The 24h urinary protein of treatment group were significantly lowered, significantly better than the control group (P0.05). The patients’ hypersensitive C-reactive protein , urine protein, urine occult blood, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine of treatment group were signi

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

zyigtangvc + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档