疏肝止痛法治疗Ⅲ型前列腺炎的临床探究.pdfVIP

疏肝止痛法治疗Ⅲ型前列腺炎的临床探究.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
疏肝止痛法治疗Ⅲ型前列腺炎的临床探究

提 要 目的:观察疏肝止痛法治疗Ⅲ型前列腺炎的临床疗效。 方法:将60例Ⅲ型前列腺炎患者随机分为两组;治疗组30例采用疏肝止痛方水煎 服,每日2次;对照组30例采用α-受体阻滞剂+非甾体抗炎镇痛药口服。对比观察治 疗前后两组患者的病情变化,并记录用药后各种副作用。 结果:治疗2月后,治疗组、对照组总有效率分别为73.33% 、43.33% ;经统计 学分析,治疗组与对照组之间具有显著性统计学差异(P0.05) ;治疗组疗效优于对照 组。半年后的复发率对照,治疗组与对照组比较具有统计学差异(P0.05) 。 结论:疏肝止痛法治疗Ⅲ型前列腺炎疗效好,副作用小,复发率低。 关键词 Ⅲ型前列腺炎;疏肝止痛法;临床研究 Clinical research of dispersing stagnated hepatoqi to stop pain in the treatment of prostatitis III Specialty: TCM Surgery Author: Gaofeng Tutor: Professor Gaozhaowang ABSTRACT Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of the method for dispersing stagnated hepatoqi to stop pain in the treatment of prostatitis III. Methods: 60 cases of the prostatitis III patients were randomly divided into two groups,30 patients in the treatment group treated with the prescription for dispersing stagnated hepatoqi to stop pain, being decocted in water for oral dose,2 times a day;30 patients in the control group using α-receptor blocker + non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Compared the condition change of the two groups of patients before and after the treatment;and recorded a variety of side effects after treatment. Results: After 2 months’treatment ,the general efficacy rate for the treatment group and the control group was separately 73.33% and 43.33%. Through statistical analysis,the treatment group and control group had significantly statistical differences (P 0.05); the curative effect of the treatment group was better than the control group. After six months, comparing the recurrence rate in the two groups, there was statistical difference (P 0.05). Conclusion: The method for dispersing stagnated hepato

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

iludyapz + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档