对流浪乞讨问题的宪法学分析一（A constitutional analysis of the problem of vagrancy and begging）.docVIP

下载本文档

9
0
约2.85万字
约 18页
2017-07-23 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

对流浪乞讨问题的宪法学分析一（A constitutional analysis of the problem of vagrancy and begging）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

对流浪乞讨问题的宪法学分析一（A constitutional analysis of the problem of vagrancy and begging）

对流浪乞讨问题的宪法学分析一（A constitutional analysis of the problem of vagrancy and begging） On the constitutional begging problem analysis.Txt21 spring blossoms! If you have ever been in winter, you will have spring! If you have faith, then spring must be far away; if you are paying, then one day you will have a full circle of flowers. In this paper, by considering the law net contribution DOC documents may experience poor browsing on the WAP side. It is recommended that you first select TXT, or download the source file to the local view. A constitutional analysis of the problem of vagrancy and begging -- a constitutional analysis of the problem of vagrancy and begging Abstract: the establishment of the system of the abolition of detention and repatriation and rescue management approach does not completely solve the problems faced by many city begging, so todays China each big city still need to deal with this problem in the scope of the Constitution and the law. Starting from the constitutional experience of the United States in the field of relevant issues, this article explores the constitutional principles that must be followed in local legislation. Similar to the United States, the Chinese Constitution does not mention the right to beg or sleep, but it also defines the basic rights of citizens related to such issues. Based on the relevant constitutional experience of China and the United States, this paper argues that the government should not limit the begging and sleeping activities, but must ensure that these restrictions are in line with the basic requirements of the constitution. First, they aim at behavior, not Rangers or beggars. If the relevant provisions are aimed at human identity rather than behavior, then it does not conform to the principle of constitutional equality. Second, the government can only limit these actions in the presence of a legitimate public interest. If government measures do not have sufficient public interest and restrict the freedom or rig