浅谈铁路运输人身损害赔偿的几个问题（Discussion on several issues of compensation for personal injury in railway transportation）.doc

浅谈铁路运输人身损害赔偿的几个问题（Discussion on several issues of compensation for personal injury in railway transportation） Discussion on several issues of compensation for personal injury in railway transportation Author: Rong Peng release time: 2010-04-14 08:58:07 The Supreme Peoples Court on January 4, 2010, promulgated the on some issues of applicable law in trial of cases of disputes over compensation for personal injuries in railway transport explanation, unified trial of some controversial questions dispute cases of personal injury compensation in railway transportation involves understanding, unified justice scale. In this regard, the author of this paper, starting from his practical work, talks about his own views on the understanding and application of the interpretation. With the continuous development of railway transportation, people enjoy the efficient and fast transportation mode brought by modern science and technology civilization, but also inevitably bring danger and damage to peoples property and human. But for a long time, because people apply for railway traffic accident personal injury liability and negligence against nature, liability of railway transportation enterprises, especially the different understanding of the responsibility of compensation for underage victims, not only the victims of railway accidents rights can not be timely and effective relief, and the judicial trial the case, which is similar to somesentence phenomenon have occurred, to a certain extent affected the peoples courts external image. Case review: how to play youth by rolling residual compensation in railway line On January 13, 2002, 16 am, 49032 freight trains entered a station and stopped at 3 stations to repair the machine. Yang (male, born in August 20, 1996) and two students came to play at the rear of the freight train. The train leaves, Yang run. After surgery, the left forearm, left lower leg and leg were amputated, and the judicial appraisal constituted two disability. No