产品质量案例（Product quality case）.docVIP

产品质量案例（Product quality case） Case classification of civil law (product quality responsibility) Article source: unknown number of visitors: update time: 2006-3-24 [case] plaintiff: stone, male, 34 years old. Defendant: a wholesale commodity store. In June 9, 1993, Shi bought 40 boxes of beer from a wholesale store and pulled the beer home with a truck. When stone discharge to thirty-sixth boxes, one of the bottles of beer suddenly exploded, resulting in stone right eye injury, and because of invalid treatment, stone blind right eye. Because danmou during transportation and handling of the beer does not have any fault, so he claims to a commodity wholesale shop, but the store says the bottle explosion may be due to manufacturers due to the unqualified result, he did not fault, so to danmou to the manufacturers claim, then taken to court danmou. [problem] 1. can the manufacturer satisfy the lawsuit request of stone? 2. stone can directly to the sale of beer wholesale store ask for compensation? 3. how can the peoples court resolve the dispute? [judgment] The peoples court accepted the case, after the trial, found that: danmou eye injury is due to substandard quality of beer and beer is caused by the commodity wholesale shop, therefore, there is a causal relationship between danmou injury and beer quality defects; danmou in the handling process and no fault; the fact that danmou there is damage to the. According to the peoples Court of the peoples Republic of China law article 122nd, the peoples Republic of China product quality law article thirtieth, article thirty-first, Peoples Republic of China consumer protection law article forty-first shall make the following judgments: 1., commodity wholesale stores bear civil liability, compensation for the plaintiff stone medical expenses, living allowance, loss of work subsidies, the cost of disability caused by a total of 6000 yuan; 2. the judgment of this case has been completed within 10 days from the date of entry into fo