标准必要专利禁令行为的反垄断规制探析 - 北大法宝.pdf

标准必要专利禁令行为的反垄断规制探析 - 北大法宝.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
标准必要专利禁令行为的反垄断规制探析 - 北大法宝

Abstract: Seeking and enforcing injunction is one of the fundamental rights for a patent holder, but a standard could act as a platform for a SEP holder to unreasonably exercise this kind of right, resulting in the effect of eliminating or restricting competition, and ultimately destroying competition order and consumers’ welfare. It is the anti-competitive effects that warrant anti-monopoly rules to get involved in the conflicting area of interface between exercise of private right and public interest protection. When applying the prohibition regulations of abusing market dominant position under Anti-monopoly Law, antitrust authorities could take into account relevant elements concerning SEP holders, the alleged infringers as well as consumers, in order to bring the outcome of anti-monopoly regulation into full play. Key Words: standard-essential patent; injunction; abuse; anti-monopoly SEP Standard-Essential PatentsSEP SEP SEP SEP SEP SEP

文档评论(0)

magui + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8140007116000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档