翻译老外细数‘西方女权’卑劣极其产生背景(四)极其重要.docVIP

With AA being based on these false assumptions, the discrimination against men is unjustifed, particularly when men are the main providers for their families. And who benefits from AA? Overwhelmingly young tertiary educated women. The 50-50 workplace wont happen without massive social engineering and massive discrimination against men. That this is unjust is immaterial. Yes, according to feminists, justice too is a tool of the patriarchy to oppress women.?(‘平权法案’的出台是建立在一系列错误的’假设’上,因为它造成了对男性的’逆向歧视’,建立在’不公正’的基础上,尤其是对作为主要家庭收入来源的男性来说.那么到底谁得益于’平权法案’?得益者绝大多数都是受过教育的第三代女人.不参与大量的社会运作,不通过大量的对’男性’进行’逆向歧视’,要想在工作场合达到两性55对开’100%绝对平等’,是不可能做到的.)?3. The Law: Speaking of justice, feminists have had enormous success in transforming society by transforming the law. According to them, the problem with the law is the male focus on universals, principles, rules, distinctions, and consistency. Their goal is to rid the law of individual rights and transform it into a bundle of group rights. [15]?(法律:是为公正和正义而生,’女权分子’通过’篡改法律,已经成功地改造了社会’,根据她们的理念,法律集中体现了以’男性为中心’的普遍规则和原则,以及对立和统一的一套体系.而她们的目标就是要把普遍的’个人权利’转化为’一撮特定群体’的特权.)?Canada and Australia are at the vanguard of feminist jurisprudence, and, just as in indigenous land rights, the two countries activists feed off each other. For example, in 1990, Canadian Supreme Court Justice Bertha Wilson called for the transformation of the law along feminist principles, and for the re-education of her male colleagues in summer schools on sexism. But Australian judges already attend such re-education courses.?(加拿大和澳大利亚这两个国家成为了建立’女权法律体系’的急先锋,并且将这套法律体系作为国家的主权理念,这两个国家’臭味相投’.举个例子,在1990年,加拿大最高法院法官Bertha Wilson要求将法律按照’女权主义理念’进行修改,并且在有关’性别歧视’为话题的暑期讲习会上对他的男性同事们进行’再教育’.澳大利亚的法官们也参加了这种’再教育’)Demonstrating a blatant bias against men, Wilson on the record as saying that, women are ...less concerned than men with abstract notions of justice, less preoccupied with what is right and wrong, .[16]. Imagine the furors if a male Supreme Court judge spouted such sexist