从汶川地震中桥梁震害看现行国内外桥梁抗震设计方法_二_抗震设计及构造.pdfVIP

27 10 Vol27 No10 2010 10 Journal ofH ighway and Transportation Research and Development ct. 2010 : 1002- 0268 ( 2010) 10- 0035- 12 () 贡金鑫, 张 勤, 王雪婷 ( , 116024) : 结合汶川地震桥梁的破坏情况, 在文献 [ 1] 的基础上, 对我国日本美国欧洲新西兰等 范的抗震设 计方法进行了分析对于能力设计, 我国 范美国Caltrans 范采用的超强系数相同, 欧洲 范采用的值较大且考 虑了轴压比的影响在延性要求强度和变形验算方面, 各 范的 定差别很大, 考虑到过大的残余变形修复比较 困难, 日本 范 定了震后要求的最大残余变形在钢筋构造方面, 美国 范对纵向和横向钢筋最小配筋率的 定 比较简单, 我国欧洲和新西兰 范的 定考虑了轴压比的影响, 欧洲 范和新西兰 范还对纵向钢筋不被压屈提 出了要求在其他抗震措施方面, 各 范的 定也有很大不同 : 桥梁工程; 抗震; 比较; 范 + : U4425 5 : A Comparative Study on Bridge Se ism ic Design Approaches inDifferentSpecifications Based on Survey of Disaster inWenchuan Earthquake ( 2) Seism ic Design and Structure G NG Jinxin, ZHANG Qin, WANG Xueting ( Institute of StructuralEngineering, DalianUniversity ofTechnology, Dalian Liaoning 116024, China) Abstract: Followed the observation ofbridge damage inWenchuan earthquake, a comparative study, which put emphasis on seism ic design approaches in specifications ofChina, Japan, USA, Euro andNew Zealand, wasmadebased on Reference [ 1]. It is indicated that ( 1) For capability design, the overstrength factor is the same in Chinese specification and in US Caltrans specification, and the larger overstrength factor is adopted considering the influence of axial compression ratio in Eurocode. (2) There exists great difference for the requirements of ductility, strength and deformation in the specifications, a maxmi um residual deformation requirement proposed in Japanese specification considering the difficulty to restore the exce