Pavement Management Index Values – （路面管理索引值）.pdfVIP

Pavement Management Index Values – Development of a National Standard Mr. Douglas Frith Mr. Dennis Morian Pavement Evaluation Conference October 25-27, 2010 Background NCHRP 20-74A Development of Service Levels for the Interstate Highway System Develop level-of-service measures for Interstate pavements Functional Measure Structural Measure Goal was to use existing data Three Pilot States Objective of the Study Asses whether a uniform national pavement rating could be extrapolated from existing pavement management data for Interstate Highways Identify how each of the pilot states measure and report pavement distress data and determine how this data is used as an indication of pavement performance Pavement Performance Measures Considered Functional Considerations Roughness Rutting Friction Structural Considerations Pavement Distress* Pavement Stiffness Pavement Performance Measures Recommended Functional Measure Mean International Roughness Index Structural Measure Single distress index value? Equivalent measures of fatigue type distress Pilot States Florida Mississippi Washington Agency Index Values Florida Cracking Rating (CR) Mississippi Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Washington Pavement Structural Condition (PSC) Florida Crack Rating Details Consider 3 categories of cracking Report only significant cracking Engineering judgment Does not include isolated areas of cracking Cracking is reported in categories for location, severity and extent Florida Distress Definitions Class 1B Hairline cracks 1/8”, longitudinal or transverse (LT) Class II Cracks 1/8” but ¼”, LT, may have moderate spalling or branching Incl