- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
乌司他丁及奥曲肽联合治疗轻症急性胰腺炎临床探究
乌司他丁及奥曲肽联合治疗轻症急性胰腺炎临床探究[摘要] 目的 探讨乌司他丁与奥曲肽联合治疗轻症急性胰腺炎的临床疗效。 方法 将入组的89例轻症急性胰腺炎患者随机分为观察组(45例)和对照组(44例)。两组患者均予以常规治疗,包括禁食;胃肠减压,对于腹痛、腹胀、呕吐严重者置胃管持续吸引胃肠减压;经脉输液,积极补充血容量,维持水电解质和酸碱平衡;予以哌替啶止痛;抗生素及抑制胃酸等。对照组在常规治疗基础上加用注射用醋酸奥曲肽;观察组在对照组治疗上应用乌司他丁。两组患者疗程均为5 d,评价疗效。 结果 观察组总有效率为91.11%,对照组总有效率为75.00%,两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组患者治疗后血清淀粉酶[(454±87)U/L]、尿淀粉酶[(592±231)U/L]变化与对照组[(520±103)、(766±250)U/L]比较差异均有高度统计学意义(均P < 0.01)。 结论 乌司他丁与奥曲肽联合能够起到协同治疗作用,能显著改善急性轻症胰腺炎患者血清淀粉酶、尿淀粉酶水平,提高临床疗效,值得推广使用。
[关键词] 轻症急性胰腺炎;奥曲肽;乌司他丁;白细胞介素
[中图分类号] R576 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)01(b)-091-02
Clinical research of combined Ulinastatin and Octreotide in the treatment of mild acute pancreatitis
HUANG Qicong
Department of Gastroenterology, the People’s Hospital of Dapu County, Guangdong Province, Dapu 514200, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of combined Ulinastatin and Octreotide in the treatment of mild acute pancreatitis. Methods 89 cases of patients with mild acute pancreatitis were randomly divided into experiment group (45 cases) and control group (44 cases). Both of the two groups were given basic treatment, including ambrosia; gastrointestinal decompression for patients with severe abdominal pain, abdominal distension and vomiting by installing stomach tube to obtain continuous drawing; venous transfusion to actively supply blood volume and maintain water-electrolyte balance and acid-base balance; relieving pain with pethidine; taking antibiotics; inhibiting gastric acid secretion, and so on. Octreotide acetate for injection was added to control group on the basis of basic treatment, and Ulinastatin was added to experiment group on the basis of control group. The course of treatment was 5 d in both groups, then the clinical efficacy was assessed. Results The total effective rate was 91.11% in experiment group and 75.00% in control group. The differences were significant (P < 0.05). The level of serum amylase [(454±87)U/L] and urine amylase [(592±231)U/L] in
文档评论(0)