外院—周远航-南京晓庄学院毕业设计论文.DOCVIP

分 类 号： 学校代码：11460 学 号南 京 晓 庄 学 院 本 科 生 学 士 学 位 论 文 翻译腔乎？翻译体乎？ ——这是一个需要重新思考的问题 TRANSLATIONESE? TRANSLATION GENRE? ——THAT’S A QUESTION TO BE RECONSIDERED 所在院（系）： 外 国 语 学 院 学 生： 周远航 指 导 老 师： 周红民 研究起止日期：2014年9月至2015年6月 二○一五年六月  学位论文独创性声明 本人郑重声明： 本论文是本人在导师指导下独立从事研究所取得的成果。文中除以参引或注释形式标明出处者外，不含任何其他个人或机构已发表或未发表的著述或研究结果。对本文的研究做出贡献的个人和机构，均已在“致谢”中加以说明。 本人完全了解，违反上述声明所引起的一切法律责任将由本人承担。 本人签名_______________ 年 月 日  Translationese? Translation Genre? ——That’s a Question to be Reconsidered by Zhou Yuanhang A Thesis Submitted to School of Foreign Languages of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts Supervised by Zhou Hongmin June, 2015 Abstract Translation style has long been held as a subject of controversy in Chinese culture, and up to now no agreement has reached on how to approach the problem for related to it there have emerged quite a number of terminology such as translationese (翻译腔) , translatorese （译者文体）, foreignized tone （洋腔洋调）, foreignized flavor（洋味，外国味）, Europeanization（欧化）, westernization（西化）, and worse still, translationese is always being confused with all the rest of terms, hence suggesting somewhat depreciation toward the language of this nature. In the study, two terms are adopted to develop the subject, translationese, which is usually associated with bad translation, and translation genre which is intended to cover all the rest terminology. In contrast with the pejorative ‘translationese’, the paper, by making a systematic study of the development, cause, and nature of translation genre, tries to argue for its inevitability, necessity sand contribution to the Chinese language evolution. The study consists of the following five parts. Part One presents the background of the subject, revealing its status-quo, pointing to the fact that ‘translationese’ has long been confused with ‘translation genre’ which, consequently, has been unjustifiably taken as the object of critici