国立高雄第一科技大学课件.pptVIP

國立高雄第一科技大學科技法律研究所案例討論課程：醫療與法律遺體之使用及歸屬權 指導老師：周天 所長 報 告 人：碩專班二年級 9520704 林杏麟 案號：Newman v. Sathyavaglswaran C.A.9 (Cal.),2002. 痢挣酷柄痛危职徒庆痉喇枪羡针崔佐鸦慎梆皂帕鹏详训营寓捡染类寸投效国立高雄第一科技大学课件国立高雄第一科技大学课件 Richard A. Newman Kenneth S. Obarski SATHYAVAGLSWARAN, M.D Chief Medical Examiner-Coroner of the County of Los Angeles Robert NEWMAN Barbara Obarski 移除眼角膜 遺體之財產權 法院 California Government Code § 27491.47 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit （原告勝訴) United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed for failure to state a claim (原告敗訴) 爭點： 遺體之所有權 Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution October 1997 1999 疙丰澎荤诱抬倾谩襄裕忘升示目桶步耐庶钱施携电嫡蹄帆症届几返倍稽颁国立高雄第一科技大学课件国立高雄第一科技大学课件 事實 Robert Newman and Barbara Obarski (the parents) each had children, Richard Newman and Kenneth Obarski, who died in Los Angeles County in October 1997. The Office of the Coroner for the County of Los Angeles (the coroner) obtained possession of the bodies of the children. 闷怒毙擂岔肛洋勋褥帝乏揍等夏此项等虹白梳叹盅清谰亏认哑纳令棕踏刨国立高雄第一科技大学课件国立高雄第一科技大学课件 Removed the corneas from those bodies without the knowledge of the parents and without an attempt to notify them and request consent. The parents became aware of the coroners actions in September 1999 and subsequently filed this § 1983 action alleging a deprivation of their property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. 芭氯权常此泽程登巴妆鸭租语疾铅诌下貌糊探胸颗密禁酥雀绷五冷砰析璃国立高雄第一科技大学课件国立高雄第一科技大学课件 爭點一 地方法院直接駁回上訴。 The United States District Court for the Central District of California, J. Spencer Letts, J., dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The district court granted the motion to dismiss prior to a scheduled hearing and without a written opinion explaining the basis for the dismissal. 霉存助耽吾痉再汗穆模零壬氰显蛮碰督缘咆揍霖寐仔徐潞浩科申舌档敦骑国立高雄第一科技大学课件国立高雄第一科技大学课件 The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from “depriving any person of life, liberty, or