- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
法律英语写作_教案0906课件
Legal English Writing: A Practice-oriented Course;公共邮箱:legalwriting2008@126.com;The essential questions:;University Life: Objectives and Priorities;Yale Universty: college graduate objectives;;Lawyering Skills: Priorities;Lawyering Skills: a list;Professional Thinking;;Introduction I;I. Terminology:;ii. Heavy use of old-fashioned and foreign words;iii. Frequent use of pair and synonymous words;iv. Heavy use of modal verbs and imperative words;II. Part of speech;II. Part of speech (continued);II. Part of speech (continued);III. Syntax;Long and complete sentences: (17 normal)
If the bill of lading contains particulars concerning the general nature, leading marks, number of packages or pieces, weight or quantity of the goods which the carrier or other person issuing the bill of lading on his behalf knows or has reasonal grounds to suspect do not accurately represent the goods actually taken over or, where a shipped bill of lading issued, loaded, or if he had no reasonable means of checking such particulars, the carrier or such other person must insert in the bill of lading a reservation specifying these inaccuracies, grounds of suspicion of the absence of reasonable means of checking.
;III. Syntax (continued);Introduction II;I Legal Reasoning in General;II. Legal Reasoning Contrasted;;III. Examples of Legal Reasoning in Anglo-American Law ;;;General principles of the Balancing Test
Consider all of the facts and circumstances.
No single factor determines the case.
Equity: This is the moralistic argument that we want to cure harms to an injured party and deter bad behavior.
Example: unconscionability in a contract;iii. Public Policy Argument
A strong country-specific type of argument:
Honor-killing.
Equity: moralistic argument
Economic Efficiency: all rules be based on a cost-benefit analysis.
Predictability: law’s chief function;Legal Interpretations;Course I Case Brief;I. The Merits of Case Reading;II. The Composition of Case;Holding and dicta: the core of
文档评论(0)