《藤野先生》（Mr. Fujino）.docVIP

《藤野先生》（Mr. Fujino） I would like to start with a topic on teaching and research: As for the text, there are several different kinds of understanding. What should we understand? The 1 title is Mr. Fujino. The text mainly praises Mr. Fujinos noble character 2, more than half of the content of the text to write the authors experience and ideas, mainly show the authors patriotism, thoughts and feelings 3, the text of the authors life on the road of a past, so it has written Mr. Fujino, and wrote his own course of thought In my opinion, Mr. Fujino is to write their own mentor, is chaohuaxishi in the series (Fan Ainong and John (The Classic of the Great Wilderness) etc.) in an article, this point should not have doubts about what the ambiguity, it is because of the beginning of the five paragraph to write his own experience from Tokyo to study in Sendai, and in the middle of inserting lantern narrative and do not say these are the narrative and the acquaintance, Mr. Fujino is not related to the account, more importantly, this is the characteristic of Lu Xun: there are always a lot of so-called free text, his style of writing and sometimes swing open again, can timely shut up to free state and a little, this paper involves the wording of this article is through exchanges between himself and Mr. Fujino, to write a teacher: thus, in this paper, it is obvious that there are two points of concern, one is Mr. Fujino, two is me. To be exact, the article is written in Mr. Fujino between me and Mr. Fujino At the beginning of the five paragraph of I and Chinese students, write I in the misfits do not adapt to life in Sendai, reveals the I state of existence dilemma and Mr. Fujino is in a desperate situation I can not get rid of the plight of the I, he did not expect care for my lonely heart is undoubtedly a great comfort And around the so-called leakage problem and storm events, events caused by the slide, reveals another dilemma: a weak state of intellectuals in the Russo Japanese