- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
GRE argument高分作文实例解析-智课教育旗下智课教育
智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料
GRE
argument高分作文实例解析-智课教育旗下智课教育
本文以一篇GRE argument高分作文实例为大家系统介绍GRE argu
ment作文的写作技巧和方法,希望可以给大家一些写作参考,更好地
备考GRE作文考试。
GRE argument高分作文实例解析,我们一起来看一下解析的GRE
argument高分作文范文题目:
The following recommendation was made by the president
and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institute, to
the colleges governing committee.“We recommend that Grove
College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education
rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority
of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it
would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But 80
percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the
students government wanted the school to remain all female,
and over half of the alumni who answered a separate survey also
opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all-female, therefore,
will improve morale among students and convince alumni to
keep supporting the college financially.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence
is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the
evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
考生Argument的全文如下(考生原创回忆):
The recommendation made by the president and
administrative staff of a private institution to the colleges
governing committee claimed that the century-old tradition of
all-female education are supposed to maintain instead of
admitting men into its program. The claim seems to be
well-reasoned and trustworthy at the first glance,
however,considering the weak evidence provided by the
institution, the conclusion is unconvincing and unreliable.
The institution has failed to take opinions from other groups
into consideration. It is mentioned in the recommendation that a
majority of faculty members indeed voted for coeducation,
believing that the change is about to stimulate more students to
apply to Grove. The call
文档评论(0)