- 1、本文档共36页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
信任与儿童发展分析
信任与儿童发展;汇报内容:;汇报顺序:;汇报顺序:;Evaluating and Approaching a Strange Animal: Children’s Trust in Informant Testimony;摘要;摘要;BACKGROUD;BACKGROUD;Present Research;Finally, we conducted Experiment 1B to determine whether a comparison group of children trusted each informant at a baseline level, in the absence of competing testimony.
最后,做实验1B,探讨一个对照组是否相信每个信息提供者(作为基线水平),没有矛盾信息。
we expected participants to endorse the zookeeper’s claims to a greater extent than those of the maternal figure.
预期被试更大程度上会支持动物园管理员的证据。
We also predicted that children would be more likely to endorse positive information about the animal with age, irrespective of informant type.
同样预期被试随年龄增长更可能支持积极信息。;Experiment 1A;2.Design and procedure
First, children were shown a photograph of the cuscus or quoll. The experimenter confirmed that children had not heard of the animal and provided them with basic information.
给被试展示两种袋鼠的图片,主试要确定被试从来没有听过这种动物并提供动物的基本信息。
The experimenter then showed the child the images of the informants, a maternal figure and a zookeeper, paired with brief introductions of each person.
然后主试向被试展示信息提供者的图片,母亲形象和动物管理员,分别配有简短的介绍。;(a) cuscus marsupial(袋貂袋);(a) maternal figure;The maternal informant;Based on condition assignment, participants received positive information from one informant and negative information from the other informant.
被试接受来自一位信息提供者的积极信息和另一位提供者的消极信息。
;Half of the participants were assigned randomly to receive positive information from the maternal figure and negative information from the zookeeper.
一半被试被随机分配接受母亲形象(积极信息),管理员(消极信息)。另一半反之。
Within each group, half of the participants were told about a “cuscus,” whereas the remaining half were told about a “quoll.”
有一半被试接受的是袋貂袋的信息,另一半是袋鼬袋的信息。;Afterward, participants were asked “Who do you think is right about the animal?” which was the main dependent measure.
测量主要的因变量。
a follow-up “degree of correctness” question was asked “How right do you think [selected informant] is?” To determine whether children credited the other informant
您可能关注的文档
- 伯纳德执行器分析.ppt
- 低血糖对2型糖尿病患者的影响分析.ppt
- 低烟无卤电缆培训分析.ppt
- 低频电磁兼容理论分析.ppt
- 住宅小区保安管理服务规程分析.doc
- 住宅楼样板引路施工方案分析.doc
- 住宅质量通病防治细则分析.doc
- 住宅楼模板施工技术交底分析.doc
- 伦敦标志性建筑分析.ppt
- 低血糖识别和预防分析.ppt
- 分析let s单元56ago2卷纸zheng unit56.pdf
- 塑胶材料其它分类原料pa9t 12.pdf
- md16x16数字媒体切换器设备.pdf
- 者参考项目发起人学科类型单位序列承包商修订页代码顺序典型.pdf
- 届世界天然气大会阿姆斯特丹2006add10288.pdf
- 期测试记录表每周weekly g1g6 journeys tests level 6 lesson26.pdf
- modernize-whitepaper现代化您应用程序白皮书.pdf
- anybackup产品典型案例分析.pdf
- 约克金融工程课程tfeslide32.pdf
- 广州市妇女儿童医疗中心历份教学药历01tjy.pdf
文档评论(0)