如何成为一个高效的程序员（How to become an efficient programmer）.docVIP

如何成为一个高效的程序员（How to become an efficient programmer） 1., active learning, new technology and non-technical two aspects of knowledge, poor programmers only when it really can not begin to learn knowledge. Good programmers take the initiative in learning new skills. Programmers will not only to learn new skills and knowledge, but also learn non technical knowledge, have an open mind on a variety of knowledge sources, and some people do not like to rest on its laurels. Specifically, not only a good programmer in begin to learn XAM by WPF project; good programmers a year ago to learn the XAM, because he felt it very interesting; but great programmers also read the design guidelines, the availability of WPF applications (usability) or what similar theory the course of study, so he can make exceptional UI. 2., pragmatism without dogma and adherence to unwritten programming rules is often a luxury, and not many developers can afford it. If your specifications are not written by the top developers, nor are they written by the top developers, I can assure you that you may not be able to afford them. I have often been able to meet some programmers who cannot or refuse to do a task just because they are not accepted for best practice. Which business needs are seldom on the demand of the technology adopted; no one would say, that we should not put the needs of written specifications, because to achieve this demand, the programmer had to write a very smelly code. At the end of the day, the programmers task is to generate a valid application, and not to demand perfection in terms of technology. Im not defending junk code. What Im trying to say is that there are always times when you write some code that youll never show as an example of the right way to do things. If there is only one type of writing, then the code is not a bad code - but make sure you have exhausted all other possible scenarios. 3. know how to find the answer through the research through the research can not only