【科普工具文】请对照这二十四条逻辑谬误自行打脸([the] science tools please control these twenty-four logical fallacies to face).docVIP

【科普工具文】请对照这二十四条逻辑谬误自行打脸([the] science tools please control these twenty-four logical fallacies to face).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
【科普工具文】请对照这二十四条逻辑谬误自行打脸([the] science tools please control these twenty-four logical fallacies to face)

【科普工具文】请对照这二十四条逻辑谬误自行打脸([the] science tools please control these twenty-four logical fallacies to face) Item 1: Scarecrow You distort other peoples ideas so that you can attack others more easily. You exaggerate, distort, or even create other peoples opinions out of thin air to make your point of view seem more reasonable. This is an extremely dishonest act, which not only affects rational discussion, but also affects the credibility of your own views. Because if you can distort other peoples views negatively, you may distort your views from the positive side. Example: Xiaoming said the country should invest more budget to the development of education industry, Alice replied: I cant imagine you are so unpatriotic, actually want to reduce defense spending, to take advantage of foreign powers. Xiao Hong made the scarecrow mistake. -------------------------------------------------------------- Second: error attribution You may have a correlation between the two things, and you can see that one thing is the cause of another. When you see two things at the same time, you feel that one of these things is the cause of the other. Your mistake is that the two things at the same time are not necessarily causal. Maybe the two things have a common cause, or two things have no cause and effect relationship at all. Their direct coexistence is only a coincidence. The first occurrence of one thing over another does not make any difference between the two. Example: little red points out that over the past few centuries, the number of global pirates has decreased and global temperatures have risen, resulting in a reduction in the number of pirates that has caused climate change, and pirates can reduce global temperatures. Xiao Hong made the fallacy of attribution of error. -------------------------------------------------------------- Third: appeal to feelings You try to replace a powerful argument by manipulating other peoples feelings. The emotions you operate may include fear, jea

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档