论语言转向的性质和意义(On the nature and significance of linguistic turn).docVIP

论语言转向的性质和意义(On the nature and significance of linguistic turn).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
论语言转向的性质和意义(On the nature and significance of linguistic turn)

论语言转向的性质和意义(On the nature and significance of linguistic turn) On the nature and significance of the linguistic turn. [author] Wang Lu [author] Wang Lu China Academy of Social Sciences Institute of Philosophy In the fields of Philosophy in the twentieth Century language shift, object, method and style of study of philosophy philosophy, has a great effect, which has undergone fundamental changes. It is worth noting that, now the field of Philosophy in our country, many people believe that the linguistic turn is outdated, even as its direct product and the results of the analysis of philosophy and the philosophy of language has been out of date. They also believe that this result is inevitable, because the basic mathematical logic method of the revolution for the survival of the limitations of the formal methods: Godel theorem states that there is a contradiction; the methods of linguistic analysis is a lot of limitations; the fundamental problem of philosophy, especially the problem of metaphysics is not so the method to solve the. In a sense, these views seem to have some truth. Because in the international academic circles, analytical philosophy and the philosophy of language does not like that new people, and it would not is almost the only main schools of philosophy; modern logic is really limited, it can not solve all the problems of philosophy. But I think that there are two fundamental errors of above two kinds of Views: one is to emphasize the linguistic turn out, while ignoring its result; another is the limitation of language to calm to modern logical methods. It should be noted, people who hold this view often lack sufficient knowledge and real grasp of modern logic, so they only know modern logic to the linguistic turn, but do not know why can contribute to the linguistic turn of modern logic; they only know modern logic to make the analysis of philosophical problems of more detailed and more accurate, but dont know what the problem in modern logic is how

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档