中企海外互拆台（Overseas mutual defeating）.docVIP

中企海外互拆台（Overseas mutual defeating） Overseas mutual defeating Technical research group of China Samsung Economic Research Institute Zhang Shenwei When it comes to Chinese enterprises walk out, we tend to focus on the gap between China enterprises and foreign enterprises, such as the technology is not advanced, the lack of brand influence is weak, the lack of international business experience. However, this kind of thinking actually chooses the wrong comparison. For a Chinese company in reality, the real competitors he faces may not be foreign companies, but precisely his counterparts from china. Recently, there are China companies said in overseas bid are most afraid of foreign land refresher, is often Acquaintances meet exceptionally jealous. In recent years, Chinas high-speed rail technology has been advancing rapidly, and it already has the strength to impact overseas markets. However, two Chinese railway rolling stock enterprises, CSR and china CNR, have already won the battle in overseas markets. According to reports, the SASAC recently criticized the north car malicious lower prices behavior. In order to avoid vicious competition, the Ministry of Railways and the SASAC have even proposed the merger of CSR and the north. In April 2011, Chinas two largest telecom equipment companies clashed. HUAWEI sued ZTE for infringement of its trademark and patent intellectual property rights in Europe, and ZTE immediately filed a counterclaim. The two rising in the global communications industry star, unexpectedly tongshicaoge, distraught. The vicious competition is extremely disadvantageous to the internationalization process of Chinese enterprises. It will reduce the profitability of enterprises, and is likely to lead to enterprises to reduce the quality of products or services, and even make the contract ultimately difficult to fulfill. For example, Chinese Overseas Engineering Co. Ltd. Poland Expressway Construction in the bidding quotation, half less than Poland governm