不同箱体形式混凝土密肋空心楼盖受力性能试验 experiment on mechanical behavior of concrete hollow-ribbed floor with different box.pdfVIP

３３ ２ Vol．３３ No．２ ２０１６ ３ Journal of Architectureand Civil Engineering Mar．２０１６ ：１６７３‐２０４９（２０１６）０２‐０００７‐０８ １ １ １ １ １ ，２ ， ， ， ， （１ ． ， ４１００８２ ；２ ． ， ４０００４４） ：，１ 、１ 、１ ，３ ， 、‐、‐、‐， 、。 ：， ； ，，、 ；。 ：；；；； ：TU３７５ ．２ ：A Experiment on Mechanical Behavior of Concrete Hollow ‐ribbed Floor with Different Box １ １ １ １ １ ，２ WU Fang‐bo ，ZHANG Hang ，LI Jun ，OUYANG Jing ，ZHOU Xu‐hong （１ ．Collegeof Civil Engineering ， Hunan University ，Changsha４１００８２ ， Hunan，China； ２ ．Schoolof Civil Engineering ，Chongqing University ，Chongqing ４０００４４ ，China） Abstract ：Three specimens with different boxes， a cast‐in‐ lace slab， a visible‐box slab and anp invisible‐box slab，weredesignedto study theinfluenceof box onmechanicalbehavior of concrete hollow‐ribbedfloor ．Thefailurepatterns，load‐straincurvesof rebar andconcreteaswellasload‐ deflection curves at mid‐span， were obtained by static experiment ． The cracking moment and ultimate moment of specimens were analyzed comparatively ． The results show that the precast concrete box works well with cast‐in‐ lace ribs， stiffness of cast‐in‐ lace slab and assembledp p monolithic slab are about the same． The cracking moment and ultimate moment of visible‐box slab and invisible‐box slab are lower than those of cast‐in‐ lace slab， on account of feeblep interface between cast‐in‐ lace ribs and precast concrete box ， as well as discrete rebars at thep bottom of slab． The calculated values of cracking moment and ultimate moment are in good agreement with the test values． Key words ：concrete； hollow‐ribbed floor； static experiment； assembled monolithic； me