analysis of american and japanese management model comparison and scope（美国和日本的管理模式的分析比较和范围）.docVIP

Analysis of American and Japanese management model comparison and Scope [Abstract] This paper studies the United States, Japan managed institutional differences, mainly in the following areas: Japanese companies pay more attention to staff on the use of common knowledge, and therefore Japanese enterprise management system is characterized as follows: the abstract work content design, management and employees joined to horizontal coordination, the performance of decentralized management system, while U.S. companies are more concerned about employees’ professional knowledge, so the American enterprise management system is characterized as follows: the specification rigorous work design, professional management and vertical coordination, the performance of centralized management system. Finally, we compared two management models and analysis pointed out the differences between the scope of both. [Paper Keywords] American companies, Japanese companies, the scope of Many social entrepreneurs and academics are very concerned about US-Japan business between these two different management systems. Some people think that, between the two different cultural backgrounds is both the generation and management of its roots. Two culture between countries can not be copied, so the management system of the two countries is impossible to replicate, while others believe that no two completely split management theory, management theory all the world should be a complete whole Japanese management system is in the fifties and sixties of management experience in the United States generated on the basis, so the Japanese management system can not be said to be entirely determined by the Japanese culture, can only say that the United States of management experience combined with local culture, but still the U.S. model of development. 1980s, the Japanese experience in management gradually get the attention of U.S. companies now, team management, employee participation, and timely pro