analysis of those facing the death penalty does not extradite the development of principles and human rights protection（分析那些面临死刑不引渡原则和人权保障的发展）.doc

Analysis of those facing the death penalty does not extradite the development of principles and human rights protection Abstracts of the European Court of Human Rights judgment in the case of Jens Sorin makes of those facing the death penalty does not extradite “principle of a wide range of international influence, and gradually recognized by the practice of the international community refused to extradite those facing the death penalty based on the protection of human rights considerations The examples are not uncommon, and those facing the death penalty does not extradite principles remain useful, but also promote the development of human rights protection, but this will undoubtedly lead to certain ideas between the requesting State and the requested State, institutional conflict in clear on the basis of principles and the protection of human rights of those facing the death penalty does not extradite to grasp the degree of the two, to find a balance, thus promoting the common development of the two. The Paper Keywords those facing the death penalty does not extradite the protection of human rights principle of legality I. Overview (Merits Profile Jens Sorin (Jens Soering is a German citizen, was accused in 1985 in Virginia, United States cruel means of killing his girlfriend Elizabeth (Elizabeth’s parents. Subsequently, Sorin from Virginia began to flee in 1986 in the United Kingdom due to bounced checks fraud was arrested after a request for extradition to the United Kingdom in 1989, Sorin will be reported to the European Court of Human Rights. European Court of Human Rights held that, Sorin be extradited, would violate lt;lt; European Convention on Human Rights gt;gt; “no one shall be subjected to torture or to subject them to inhuman or insulting treatment or punishment” provisions because this will lead to a phenomenon to be dead (deathrowphenomenon Sorin after judgment to the implementation of the strict conditions of confinement within