on chinese literary criticism should be renamed poetry review history （在中国文学批评应该改名为u201c诗歌评论u201c历史u201d）.docVIP

On Chinese Literary Criticism should be renamed ‘Poetry Review’ history ‘ Paper to write network: Abstract: China’s “poetry assessment” with its distinctive national characteristics and different in the West, “literary criticism”, the two plausible. West is “like”, it seems to “yes”, but if a careful analysis, the “non” is - from the external face of the inner charm, totally not the case children. China’s “poetry Comments on” learning or similar discipline with the West there is a huge difference is an indisputable fact. We used the introduction of the West “literary criticism” has arisen on the concepts and terminology of some negative results, that is the crux of the problem: some scholars Western literary theory and even look to see the “same” or “pass” (to pass around) aspects, namely, “like” side, and not even look to see less “different” or “separated” (incommensurable) of , that is “non” side, while the latter is the key and crucial to the Different ethnic groups with the backing of the humanities is between the “differences”, “separated” and “non”, which points to the inherent uniqueness , to obtain a qualification in the world, life and value of existence, it is precisely because of this “different”, “separated” and “non”, was so that the colorful world of culture (including the variety of academic activities into factions) in the “Distinction” in phase g, blending, Infiltration, interactive, competitive students, competing long, continuous development and prosperity, we should not apply the Western academic disciplines title just put the name and “literary criticism” on us Literary Theory head and solemnly gave it already has a title: “poetry assessment”; “Chinese Literary Criticism,” should also be called “‘Poetry Review’ history.” Keywords: poetry assessment; the history of Chinese literary criticism, literary criticism, ethnic characteristics “Poetry Review” The birth of subjects lt;lt;Sikuquanshuzongmu feedgt;gt; (it is mainly the authors