网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

扩大时间窗动、静脉联合溶栓治疗急性脑梗死临床探究.doc

扩大时间窗动、静脉联合溶栓治疗急性脑梗死临床探究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
扩大时间窗动、静脉联合溶栓治疗急性脑梗死临床探究

扩大时间窗动、静脉联合溶栓治疗急性脑梗死临床探究  [摘要]目的 探讨扩大时间窗动、静脉联合溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月~2016年6月在我院神经内科接受治疗的60例急性脑梗死患者的临床资料,将其随机分成对照组与研究组,均30例。对照组行常规时间窗(发病时间在4.5 h之内)动、静脉联合溶栓治疗,研究组行扩大时间窗(发病4.5~10 h)动、静脉联合溶栓治疗。比较两组美国国立卫生院卒中(NIHSS)评分、日常生活活动能力量表-巴氏(BI)指数、并发症发生情况,评价两组临床疗效。结果 治疗前,治疗后7、14 d,两组NIHSS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05);治疗后2、24 h,两组NIHSS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。治疗后14 d,两组临床疗效及并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05);治疗后28 d,两组BI指数比较,差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。结论 与常规时间窗动、静脉溶栓治疗相比,扩大时间窗动、静脉联合溶栓治疗急性脑梗死,同样可有效改善患者神经功能缺损情况,提高日常生活能力,且并发症发生率较低,疗效显著,值得推广。  [关键词]扩大时间窗;动、静脉联合溶栓;急性脑梗死  [中图分类号] R743.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)10(a)-0059-03  [Abstract]Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of expanding time window of arteriovenous thrombolysis in treatment of acute cerebral infarction(ACI).Methods The clinical data of 60 ACI patients treated in the neurology department of hospital from January 2015 to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed,and they were randomly divided into control group and research group,30 cases in each group.Control group took routine time window (onset time within 4.5 h) of arteriovenous thrombolysis;research group took expanding time window (onset time within 4.5-10 h) of arteriovenous thrombolysis.NIHSS,BI scores and occurrence of complications of two groups were compared,and clinical efficacy of two groups were evaluated.Results Before treatment,7 d and 14 d after treatment,there was no statistical difference in NIHSS scores compared between the two groups(Pgt;0.05);after treatment 2, 24 h,the NIHSS score of two groups was compared,the difference was statistically significant (Plt;0.05).14 d after treatment,there was no statistical difference in clinical efficacy and incidence of complications compared between the two groups(Pgt;0.05);28 d after treatment,there was no statistical difference in BI compared between the two groups (Pgt;0.05).Conclusion Compared with routine time window of arteriovenous thrombolysis,expanding time window of arteriovenous thrombolysis for treating

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档