smoking in childrens environment test a qualitative study of experiences of a new instrument applied in preventive work in child health care在孩子的吸烟环境测试经验的定性研究的新工具应用于预防儿童卫生保健工作.pdfVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约7.21万字
约 10页
2017-09-12 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

smoking in childrens environment test a qualitative study of experiences of a new instrument applied in preventive work in child health care在孩子的吸烟环境测试经验的定性研究的新工具应用于预防儿童卫生保健工作.pdf

1、本文档共10页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

smoking in childrens environment test a qualitative study of experiences of a new instrument applied in preventive work in child health care在孩子的吸烟环境测试经验的定性研究的新工具应用于预防儿童卫生保健工作

Carlsson et al. BMC Pediatrics 2011, 11:113 /1471-2431/11/113 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access “Smoking in Children’s Environment Test”: a qualitative study of experiences of a new instrument applied in preventive work in child health care 1,2* 3 1,4,5 3 Noomi Carlsson , Siw Alehagen , Boel Andersson Gäre and AnnaKarin Johansson Abstract Background: Despite knowledge of the adverse health effects of passive smoking, children are still being exposed. Children’s nurses play an important role in tobacco preventive work through dialogue with parents aimed at identifying how children can be protected from environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure. The study describes the experiences of Child Health Care (CHC) nurses when using the validated instrument SiCET (Smoking in Children’s Environment Test) in dialogue with parents. Method: In an intervention in CHC centres in south-eastern Sweden nurses were invited to use the SiCET. Eighteen nurses participated in focus group interviews. Transcripts were reviewed and their contents were coded into categories by three investigators using the method described for focus groups interviews. Results: The SiCET was used in dialogue with parents in tobacco preventive work and resulted in focused discussions on smoking and support for behavioural changes among parents. The instrument had both strengths and limitations. The nurses experienced that the SiCET facilitated dialogue with parents and gave a comprehensive view of the child’s ETS exposure. This gave nurses the possibility of taking on a supportive role by offering parents long-term help in protecting their child from ETS exposure and in considering smoking cessation. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the SiCET sup