the ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides unanswered dilemmas人类志愿者的伦理研究涉及实验接触杀虫剂悬而未决的难题.pdfVIP

the ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides unanswered dilemmas人类志愿者的伦理研究涉及实验接触杀虫剂悬而未决的难题.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
the ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides unanswered dilemmas人类志愿者的伦理研究涉及实验接触杀虫剂悬而未决的难题

London et al. Environmental Health 2010, 9:50 /content/9/1/50 REVIEW Open Access The ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides: unanswered dilemmas 1* 2 3,7 4 5 6,8 Leslie London , David Coggon , Angelo Moretto , Peter Westerholm , Martin F Wilks , Claudio Colosio Abstract The controversy about the use of data from human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesti- cides as part of regulatory risk assessment has been widely discussed, but the complex and interrelated scientific and ethical issues remain largely unresolved. This discussion paper, generated by authors who comprised a work- group of the ICOH Scientific Committee on Rural Health, reviews the use of human experimental studies in regula- tory risk assessment for pesticides with a view to advancing the debate as to when, if ever, such studies might be ethically justifiable. The discussion is based on three elements: (a) a review of discussion papers on the topic of human testing of pesticides and the positions adopted by regulatory agencies in developed countries; (b) an ana- lysis of published and unpublished studies involving human testing with pesticides, both in the peer-reviewed lit- erature and in the JMPR database; and (c) application of an ethical analysis to the problem. The paper identifies areas of agreement which include general principles that may provide a starting point on which to base criteria for judgements as to the ethical acceptability of such studies. However, the paper also highlights ongoing unresolved differences of opinion inherent in ethical analysis of contentious issues, which we propose should form a starting point for further debate an

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

118zhuanqian + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档