乏燃料循环热工殷浩.docxVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
乏燃料循环 殷浩 (1. 哈尔滨工业大学能源学院核反应堆工程专业,哈尔滨 150090,Email:y126.com) 摘要: 目前,对于乏燃料的管理,国际上主要有两种战略考虑:其一是后处理战略。即对乏燃料中所含的96%的有用核燃料进行分离并回收利用,裂变产物和次锕系元素固化后进行深地质层处置或进行分离嬗变,这是一种闭路核燃料循环。其特点是铀资源利用率提高,减少了高放废物处置量并降低其毒性,但缺点是费用可能较高,可生产高纯度的钚,有核扩散的风险。其二是一次通过战略。即乏燃料经过冷却、包装后作为废物送入深地质层处置或长期贮存,美国曾经支持此战略,但其最终处置场尤卡山项目碰到了困难,现在美国已转向了后处理。该战略特点是费用可能较低,概念简单;无高纯钚产生,核扩散风险低。但缺点是废物放射性及毒性高,延续时间长达几百万年;没有工业运行经验。本文对这两种管理战略进行了对比探讨,并比较了相应的优缺点。 关键词:乏燃料 后处理 废料 循环 Spent nuclear fuel cycle Yin Hao (1 Harbin Institute of Technology School of energy nuclear reactor engineering, Harbin 150090, Email:y126.com) Abstract: at present, for the spent fuel management, there are two main types of international strategic thinking: one is the strategy of post-processing. Of spent fuel contained 96% of the useful nuclear fuel for separation and recycling, fission products and actinides cured in deep geological disposal or layer separation, and this is a kind of closed nuclear fuel cycle. Characterized by uranium resource utilization, decrease the high-level radioactive waste disposal and reduce its toxicity, but the disadvantage is that cost may be higher, it can produce high purity of plutonium, there is the risk of nuclear proliferation. The second is through strategic at a time. The spent fuel after cooling, packing as waste into the deep geological disposal or storage for a long time, the United States had supported the strategy, but its final disposal site the yucca mountain project met with difficulties, the United States has now turned to the post-processing. The cost may be lower, strategy is characterized by simple concept; Generating high purity plutonium, low proliferation risks. But the disadvantage is that radioactive waste and the high toxicity, duration for millions of years. No industrial operation experience. This paper compares the two kinds of management strategy of discussion, and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the corresponding. Keywords: spent fuel reprocessing waste r

文档评论(0)

ipad0b + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档