大学毕业论文指导之如何答辩-论文答辩岂能只答不辩（How to answer the question of how to answer the question of how to answer）.docVIP

下载本文档

4
0
约1.26万字
约 8页
2017-09-27 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

大学毕业论文指导之如何答辩-论文答辩岂能只答不辩（How to answer the question of how to answer the question of how to answer）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

大学毕业论文指导之如何答辩-论文答辩岂能只答不辩（How to answer the question of how to answer the question of how to answer）

大学毕业论文指导之如何答辩-论文答辩岂能只答不辩（How to answer the question of how to answer the question of how to answer） Every year this season, many graduates are busy preparing for the thesis defense. According to the provisions of the Regulations in fifth and sixth, the research of higher learning and scientific research institutions, or graduate equivalent personnel, with a masters degree or doctorate courses examination and thesis defense, the result is qualified, meet the academic level of the regulation, awarded a masters degree or doctorate. Thus, in accordance with our degree legal system, through the defense, is a necessary condition for masters and doctoral degrees. The present Regulations on academic degrees were enacted in 1980, and the eleventh meeting of the Standing Committee of the ten National Peoples Congress was amended in 2004, which further improved the degree system. However, there are no specific procedural provisions for the reply link after taking the master and doctoral degrees. As a result, institutions of higher learning and research institutions usually arrange their defense in accordance with the usual practice of the respondent. As there are many differences in the units, subjects, and defense committee members, there is a difference in the defense procedures at different defense meetings. In the past few years, I have personally checked in a number of dissertations and defense, and have also collected a large number of defensive activities. The preliminary study found that the respondent relative to the entire degree awarding process, although it is said to be a small link, but there are many interesting universities here. What I want to say today is the phenomenon that the thesis only answers no. In my own shallow understanding, the respondent has questions, answers and arguments. But I have observed that there seems to be little to be done about this. As a rule, the respondent answers only questions raised by the teacher after questioning by the defenc