我国无记名票据背书连续之研究报告.docVIP

我國無記名票據背書連續之研究 Research of the Bearer Bill to Endorse Continuously of Our Country 洪大安( 摘要 按我國票據法之規定，執票人應以背書之連續，證明其權利付款人對於背書不連續之而付款者，應自負其責。Summary According to the regulation of the Negotiable Instruments Law of our country,the bearer should endorse continuously, proves its right, and the drawee regarding endorses bill not the continuously but the drawee, should take responsibility for oneself. So-called endorses is continuously refers to bearer of from the payee to the final endorser, formally homogeneous phase continuously not interrupted, but judges the bill whether to have endorses the continuity, must depend on at the back of the bill the record, endorses respectively has the identity, and formally can judge it continuously then. But the bearer bill and does not have record of the payee, according to the above, will live the bearer bill whether to have endorses continuously as well as how to judge endorses the doubt continuously. This article discusses in our country Negotiable Instruments Law by the case type way, the bill the bill transfer to endorse the judgment as well as the bearer bill continuously whether to have endorses being suitable continuously, stipulation of from our country Negotiable Instruments Law, decision and the resolution with the Supreme court, asks the question in view of this article case, states the explanation. Key words: The bearer bill, endorse, endorse continuously, the recourse 案例： 甲簽發支票一紙,交付於乙，未記載受款人之姓名。乙記名背書轉讓與丙，丙復空白背書轉讓於丁，丁將該支票之受款人欄填入戊，並將支票交付轉讓於戊，嗣經戊依提示期限內提示後不獲付款，執票人戊對於背書人乙、丙、得否行使追索權？匯票依背書及交付而轉讓。無記名匯票得僅依交付轉讓之。執票人應以背書之連續，證明其權利，但背書中有空白背書時，其次之背書人，視為前空白背書之被背書人。付款人對於背書不連續之匯票而付款者，應自負其責。支票執票人固應以背書之連續，證明其權利。惟基於票據之流通性、無因性及交易之安全，背書是否連續，祇須依支票背面之記載，形式上得以判斷其連續即可。執票人無須證明支票各背書實質上均屬有效。故縱背書中有無權代理人所為之背書，或背書有偽造之情形，然於背書之連續並無影響。本票之發票人應於本票上記載受款人之姓名或商號，未載受款人者以執票人為受款人。至於無記名本票則得依交付轉讓之。又執票人得於無記名本票之空白內，記載自己或他人為受款人，將其變更為記名本票，票據法第一百二十條第一項第三款，第三項，第一百二十四條準用同法第三十條第一項後段及第二十五條第二項，分別定有明文。故如由發票人將受款人記載於本票時，須由受款人先為背書轉讓，始能認為背書之連續倘由執票人於無記名本票之空白內記載受款人，並將本票背書轉讓與受