儿童被忽视量表的初步编制tougao.docVIP

儿童被忽视量表的初步编制* 杨世昌①② 杜爱玲② 张亚林① 王芙蓉③ 郭果毅④ 【摘要】目的 编制一套符合我国文化背景的儿童量表评的程度作出定量评估，为研究儿童提供一个可操作的工具。方法文献既往量表中的相关条目，选用适合我国文化背景的语句表达方式，建立条目库经相关专家，筛选出效价高的条目。在湘潭市某中学初中一二年及湘潭市某职业技术学院，共计名，男性425名，平均±1.89岁，女性446名，平均±2.06岁。父母养育方式结果 儿童被忽视量表总的Cronbachs αα系数在0.785～0.812之间,劈半系数为0.644～0.793，重测系数在0.819～0.892之间。安全忽视、交流忽视、躯体忽视、情感忽视各个层面结论：关键词儿童量表编制信度效度横断面调查 Child Neglect Scale: Development, Reliability and ValidityMental Health Institute，Xiang-ya Second Hospital， Center South University， Chang-sha，410011，P. R. China;2.The second teaching hospital of Xin-xiang medical college, Xin-xiang 453003 , P.R China) 【Abstract】Objective: To develop a new scale as an assessment instrument for assessing the neglected status of child. To examine the reliability and validity of the child neglect scale (CNS).Methods: Considering the cultural background of China, an item pool was established through revising items in correlative literatures and scales. Then, the first draft of the CNS was developed by reserving effective items which were graded by interrelated experts. The sample consisted of 902 students of the junior high school and the technology and profession college. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to develop and evaluate the structure of the scale. Results: The results of reliability were as follows: the cronbach’s Alpha reliability of the whole child neglect scale was 0.785-0.848, and the split-half reliability was0.644-0.810, and the test-retest reliability was 0.819-0.897. The results of validity were as follows: the item loadings of the neglect scale over 0.30. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the ratio of Chi-square to degrees of freedom was 1.766, the goodness of fit index was 0.917, the Tucker-Lewis index was 0.916, and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.047. Criterion-related validity studies showed that the scores of the CNS were significantly correlative with the rearing styles of their parents as well. Conclusion: The internal c