Comparing lignocaine―adrenaline―tetracaine gel with lignocaine infiltration for anesthesia during repair of lacerations- A randomized trial.docVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约1.07万字
约 11页
2017-12-05 发布于福建
举报
版权申诉

Comparing lignocaine―adrenaline―tetracaine gel with lignocaine infiltration for anesthesia during repair of lacerations- A randomized trial.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Comparing lignocaine―adrenaline―tetracaine gel with lignocaine infiltration for anesthesia during repair of lacerations- A randomized trial

Comparing lignocaine―adrenaline―tetracaine gel with lignocaine infiltration for anesthesia during repair of lacerations: A randomized trial 　　BACKGROUND： This study aimed to compare the topical anesthetic lignocaine， adrenaline， and tetracaine （LAT）（4% lignocaine， 1：2 000 adrenaline， 1% tetracaine） with the conventional lignocaine infiltration（LI） for repair of minor lacerations， for the comfort of anesthetic administration， efficacy， adverse effects and cost. METHODS： This was a prospective randomized clinical trial. Forty Asian patients who required toilet and suture for minor lacerations in the emergency department of the Singapore General Hospital over a 4-month period. The patients were assigned randomly to 2 arms of treatment. The first was the LAT gel group who had LAT gel applied to the laceration prior to suturing. The second was the control group in whom the anesthetic administered was lignocaine infiltration （LI） via a syringe. The pain of the process of administering anesthetic and efficacy of anesthesia were scored using the visual pain scale included within. The efficacy of LAT vs. lignocaine infiltration as an anesthetic prior to the toilet and suture of minor lacerations and complications of therapy. RESULTS： Twenty patients were randomized to LAT gel and 16 to LI on an intention to treat analysis. The mean pain score by patients in the LAT gel group was 2.5 （0.52 SE）， and 2.5 （0.58 SE） in the LI group. The pain score for pain during application of the anesthetic was 1.5 （0.40） in the LAT gel group， and 3.5 （0.46） in the LI group. There was no difference in complications between the LAT and LI groups. CONCLUSION： LAT gel prior to the toilet and suture of minor lacerations is proven to be as efficacious as LI in terms of patient comfort and effectiveness of anesthesia. The complications are also comparable to those treated with LI. KEY WORDS： Lignocaine infiltration； Lacerations； Emergency department； Pain score World J Emerg Med 2013