美国财产法Chapter 12 Eminent Domain.docx

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
美国财产法Chapter 12 Eminent Domain

Chapter 12 Eminent DomainIntroductionDefinition: The power allowing federal, state, and local governments to take property from a private owner who refuses to voluntarily sell. The process of exercising this power to take property is called condemnation.Constitutional Limitations: The 5th Amendment: Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”(1) Private property = includes all estates and future interests in real property, and tangible and intangible personal property(2) taken = usually easily satisfied in most eminent domain cases b/c the government is obtaining some form of title + physical permanent possession of the property ( but note material on regulatory takings , which has a more complex definition)(3) For public use = discuss this in Kelo(4) Without just compensation = usually equivalent to FMV, but could be complex in certain casesDefining Public Use(1) Easy definitions/situations when public use is implicated: when private land is taken away to build a highway / to build a military base / to build a government installation / to build a public facility / to build a police station / etc.(2) Harder question: what if property is transferred from one private owner to another for economic development purposes? ? The Supreme Court - in the Kelo v. City of London case, upheld the traditional standard: the public use requirement is satisfied if the taking serves a legitimate public purpose, even if the government realizes this purposes by taking property from one owner for the purpose of conveying it to another ownerScope of public useKelo v. City of New London (2005)Facts: Pfizer Inc wants to build a research facility on the City which would create 1000 jobs to the area. In 2000, the City approved the development plan, and proposed to use the power of eminent domain to acquire some residents` property. There is no allegation that any of these properties is blighted or in poor condition. The properties were condemned only becau

文档评论(0)

xcs88858 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8130065136000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档