法律英语经典案例：2005年审判克林顿总统弹劾案.docxVIP

　　法律英语经典案例：2005年审判克林顿总统弹劾案　　上传时间:2012-2-16　　浏览次数:118　　字体大小：大中小　　The Impeachment Trial of President William Clinton　　by Douglas O. Linder (2005)　　In 1999, for only the second time in United States history, the Senate conducted an impeachment trial of a President. The acquittal of William Jefferson Clinton on February 12 came as no great surprise, given the near party-line vote on impeachment charges in the House of Representatives leading to the trial.　　Despite its predictable outcome, the impeachment trial of President Clinton is well worth studying, both for what it says about the failure of the judiciary and political institutions to respond adequately to an unprecedented situation, and what it tells us about the failures of Bill Clinton, the all-too-human occupant of the nations highest office. The trial also raises fascinating questions about the distinction between public morality and private morality.　　Background: The Paula Jones Sexual Harassment Suit　　The impeachment saga of President Clinton has its origins in a sexual harassment lawsuit brought in Arkansas in May, 1994 by Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee. In her suit, Jones alleged that on May 8, 1991, while she helped to staff a state-sponsored management conference at the Excelsior Hotel in Little Rock, a state trooper and member of Governor Clintons security detail, Danny Ferguson, approached her and told her that the Governor would like to meet her in his hotel suite. Minutes later, Jones, seeing this as an opportunity to advance her career, took the elevator to Clintons suite. There, according to her disputed account, Clinton made a series of increasingly aggressive moves, culminating in his dropping his pants exposing an erection——and then asking Jones to kiss it. Jones claimed that she stood and told the Governor, Im not that kind of girl. As she left, Clinton stopped her by the door and said, Youre a smart girl, lets keep this between ourselves.　　Lawyers for Clinton argued that the Jon