假军车论文：假军车骗免“天价过路费”一案的刑法分析.docVIP

假军车论文：假军车骗免“天价过路费”一案的刑法分析 【中文摘要】”天价过路费案”一经曝出即存在诸多争议,各界对河南农民时某骗免过路费的行为是否应当认定为诈骗罪以及对其判罚是否适当存在争论,另一方面,“财物”一词是否包含财产性利益,而使用欺骗手段骗取财产性利益能否成立诈骗罪也遭到各方质疑,本文将针对案件中行为人骗免高速路通行费的行为和案件争议焦点逐一进行分析,希望本人的刑法分析能做到法律效果和社会效果的有机统一。按照案例分析类法律硕士论文的写作要求和格式规范,全文共分为五大部分:第一部分介绍“天价过路费案”的基本案情:河南农民时某为了逃缴高速路通行费,购买了假军装、2副假军车牌,并办理了假军车行驶证、驾驶证,在长达8个月的时间里,利用假军车牌免费通行高速公路2361次,偷逃过路费数额高达368万余元。人民法院以诈骗罪判处时某无期徒刑。第二部分提出案件的争议焦点:观点一认为时某成立买卖武装部队证件罪和买卖、非法使用武装部队专用标志罪,理由是《刑法》第375条第二款和第三款;观点二认为时某的行为应当认定为合同诈骗罪,理由是时某与高速公路管理者之间是民事合同法律关系,符合合同诈骗罪的构成要件;观点三认为时某的行为应以诈骗罪判处刑罚,理由是时某使用假军车牌骗免过路费的行为符合诈骗罪的刑法构成;数额计算与量刑问题等。第三部分介绍本案所涉及的几个罪名及其构成要件:诈骗罪的构成要件;买卖武装部队证件罪和买卖、非法使用武装部队专用标志罪的构成要件;合同诈骗罪的构成要件等。第四部分介绍案件具体评述:分析时某的行为是否构成诈骗罪,着重论述了时某骗免高速公路通行费如何定性与骗免高速公路通行费属于非法骗取他人财物;分析时某使用假军用车牌和假军用证件等行为如何认定,时某的行为是否构成合同诈骗罪,时某犯罪数额计算与量刑是否合理等问题。第五部分是案件结论:依照《最高人民法院关于审理非法生产、买卖武装部队车辆号牌等刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第三条的规定及牵连犯的一般原则,对时某应当以诈骗罪判处刑罚。 【英文摘要】”Costly tolls case” once exposed that there are many disputes, the community of farmers in Henan when a toll-free behavior of cheating whether it should be recognized as a fraud and its penalties are appropriate in dispute, on the other hand, “property” a whether to include the property interests of the word, and using deceptive means to obtain property interests can be set up to defraud the parties have also been questioned, this article will focus on the perpetrator of fraud cases in highway toll-free behavior and the focus of the case step by step analysis of the dispute, hope to achieve the court抯 legal and social effect of the organic unity. According to type of legal case studies master抯 thesis writing requirements and format specifications, full-text is divided into five parts:The first section describes the “high price case of tolls,” the basic facts: when a farmer from Henan province to escape payment of highway tolls, buying a fake uniform, two fake military license plates and driving military vehicles for a fake certificate, driver抯 license, in the long up to 8 months time, the use of fake military license pla